In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of
a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant
[1994] QSC 123
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of
a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant - [1994] QSC 123
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of
a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant[1994] QSC 123
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of
a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant[1994] QSC 123
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of
a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant
Shortened Case Name:
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of
a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant
MNC:
[1994] QSC 123
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Mackenzie J
Date:
23 May 1994
Appeal Status
Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.
