In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant
[1994] QSC 123
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant - [1994] QSC 123
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 6
CITE
Unreported Judgment
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant[1994] QSC 123Mackenzie J
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant[1994] QSC 123
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant[1994] QSC 123
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant
Shortened Case Name:
In the Matter of “The Costs Act of 1867” v In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Messrs Wright & Associates, Solicitors, against Stephen James Hughes and Francis David Robert Grant carrying on business as David Grant & Associates & In the Matter of proceedings in the District Court of Queensland Plaint No. 3627 of 1990 between Stephen James Hughes as Plaintiff and Stephen Gerard O'Kane as defendant
MNC:
[1994] QSC 123
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Mackenzie J
Date:
23 May 1994
Appeal Status
Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.
