To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 28
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Klaus Heinz Uthmann v Ipswich City Council[1997] QSC 116Lee J
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Klaus Heinz Uthmann v Ipswich City Council
Shortened Case Name:
Klaus Heinz Uthmann v Ipswich City Council
MNC:
[1997] QSC 116
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Lee J
Date:
04 Jul 1997
Appeal Status
Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
Breen v Williams
(1996) 186 CLR 71
1 citation
Church of Scientology v Department of Health and Social Security
[1979] 1 WLR 723
1 citation
Conrock Ltd v CSR Ltd
(1990) 96 ALR 690
1 citation
Cooper v Bech
(1975) 12 SASR 147
1 citation
Harman v Crilly, Zurich General Accident and Liability Insurance Co. Ltd, third parties
