Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Add to List

In the matter of the Costs Act 1867 and In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Crouch & Lyndon against Lowy Pty Ltd and Barbara Lowy and In the Matter of P & E Southport Application No. 40 of 1994 between Council of the City of Gold Coast (Applicant) and Monace Pty Ltd (First Respondent) and Lowy Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)[1997] QSC 178

In the matter of the Costs Act 1867 and In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Crouch & Lyndon against Lowy Pty Ltd and Barbara Lowy and In the Matter of P & E Southport Application No. 40 of 1994 between Council of the City of Gold Coast (Applicant) and Monace Pty Ltd (First Respondent) and Lowy Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)[1997] QSC 178

Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document. Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading
(as on screen PDF)

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    In the matter of the Costs Act 1867 and In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Crouch & Lyndon against Lowy Pty Ltd and Barbara Lowy and In the Matter of P & E Southport Application No. 40 of 1994 between Council of the City of Gold Coast (Applicant) and Monace Pty Ltd (First Respondent) and Lowy Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)

  • Shortened Case Name:

    In the matter of the Costs Act 1867 and In the Matter of a Bill of Costs of Crouch & Lyndon against Lowy Pty Ltd and Barbara Lowy and In the Matter of P & E Southport Application No. 40 of 1994 between Council of the City of Gold Coast (Applicant) and Monace Pty Ltd (First Respondent) and Lowy Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)

  • MNC:

    [1997] QSC 178

  • Court:

    QSC

  • Judge(s):

    White J

  • Date:

    30 Sep 1997

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
Burdick v Garrick (1870) LR 5 Ch App 2331 citation
Chessum & Sons v Gordon [1901] 1 QB 6941 citation
DG Ogle Pty Ltd v Bowdens [1979] Qd R 5072 citations
DG Ogle Pty Ltd v Bowdens (1884) 51 L.T. (N.S.) 6223 citations
Eaves v Eaves & Powell [1956] P 1541 citation
Eaves v Eaves & Powell (1942) 60 W.N. (N.S.W.) 162 citations
Federation v The Commonwealth (1956) 94 CLR 6212 citations
Hill v Peel (1870) LR 5 CP 1721 citation
In re Blyth & Fanshaw: ex parte Wells (1882) 10 QBD 2072 citations
In re Donaldson (1888) 27 Ch D 5441 citation
In re Windeyer, Fawl & Co.; Ex parte Foley (1930) 31 SR (NSW) 1451 citation
Korner v H. Korner & Co. Ltd. [1951] Ch 102 citations
Kroehn v Kroehn (1912) 15 CLR 1371 citation
Latoudis v Casey (1991) 170 CLR 5341 citation
Malleson, Stewart, Stawell & Nankivell [1931] VLR 1271 citation
O'Sullivan, Wilson & Bedford, Re [1936] St R Qd 501 citation
Peel v London & North Western Railway Company [1907] 1 Ch 6071 citation
R v District Registrar, Kingston-Upon-Hull ex parte Norton [1944] 1 All E.R. 5463 citations
R. v District Registrar (1914) 2 KB 5291 citation
Re Bain Gasteen & Co's Bill of Costs [1990] 1 Qd R 4121 citation
Re Feez Ruthning's Bill of Costs [1989] 1 Qd R 551 citation
Re Fraser (deceased) [1958] 1 All E.R. 263 citations
Re Gould[1992] 2 Qd R 377; [1991] QSC 2871 citation
Re Lamrock, Brown & Hall; Ex parte Black (1908) VLR 2381 citation
Re Skinner & Smith's Bills of Costs (No 2) [1990] 1 Qd R 1801 citation
Sadd v Griffin [1908] 2 KB 5101 citation
Schweppes Ltd v Archer [1934] 51 WN 711 citation
Schweppes Ltd. v Archer (1934) 34 SR NSW 1781 citation
Stanley v Phillips (1966) 115 CLR 4701 citation
Sturge v Dimsdale (1846) 9 Beav 1701 citation
Sturge v Dimsdale [1846] 150 ER 3081 citation
Weiss v Barker Gosling (No 2) (1993) 17 FLR 6261 citation
Wright v Southward (1827) 1 Y and J 5271 citation
Wright v Southward [1827] 148 ER 7791 citation

Cases Citing

No judgments on Queensland Judgments cite this judgment.

1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.