To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 16
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Tasmanian Seafoods Pty Ltd v Peters[1999] QSC 144Wilson J
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Tasmanian Seafoods Pty Ltd v Peters
Shortened Case Name:
Tasmanian Seafoods Pty Ltd v Peters
MNC:
[1999] QSC 144
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Wilson J
Date:
02 Jul 1999
Appeal Status
Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
Ambler v Bolton
(1872) LR 14 Eq 427
1 citation
Austell Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Taxation (W.A.)
(1989) 20 ATR 1139
2 citations
Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth
(1992) 177 CLR 106
2 citations
Commissioner of Stamp Duties v Yeend
(1929) 43 CLR 235
1 citation
Fitti v Minister for Primary Industries and Energy
(1993) 40 FCR 286
2 citations
Fitzgerald & Anor v Masters
(1956) 95 CLR 420
2 citations
Harper v Minister for Sea Fisheries
(1989) 168 CLR 314
2 citations
Kelly v Kelly
(1990) 64 ALJR 234
2 citations
National Provincial Bank Ltd v Hastings Car Mart Ltd
(1965) AC 1175
1 citation
O'Brien v Komesaroff
(1982) 150 CLR 310
1 citation
Pennington v McGovern
(1987) 45 SASR 27
2 citations
The Queen v Toohey; Ex parte Meneling Station Pty Ltd
(1982) 158 CLR 327
1 citation
Cases Citing
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
Bargara Esplanade Management Pty Ltd v Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
