To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
R v Adamic
Shortened Case Name:
R v Adamic
MNC:
[2000] QSC 402
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Holmes J
Date:
08 Nov 2000
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2000] QSC 402 (2000) 117 A Crim R 332
08 Nov 2000
Rule that the first conversation with Constable Ottaway from that sentence of page 261 of Exhibit G in which the accused gives his date of birth other than those questions and answers concerning the accused’s address, is to be excluded; balance of the challenged evidence held admissible: Holmes J
