To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 12
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Heery v Criminal Justice Commission[2000] QSC 63White J
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Heery v Criminal Justice Commission Re Pierre Mark Le Grand
Shortened Case Name:
Heery v Criminal Justice Commission
MNC:
[2000] QSC 63
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
White J
Date:
24 Mar 2000
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2000] QSC 63 (2000) 110 A Crim R 465
24 Mar 2000
Declarations that the monitoring of conversations by the CJC was a breach of confidence and that the use of listening devices was not authorised; order that recordings, notes and transcripts of conversations be destroyed: White J
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2000] QCA 511 (2000) 119 A Crim R 313
15 Dec 2000
Appeal allowed, order for destruction of CJC material set aside; cross-appeal dismissed: Davies JA, Thomas JA, Douglas J
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
Attorney-General (U.K.) v Guardian Newspapers [No. 2]
