To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Page of 6
CITE
Unreported Judgment
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Mazelow Pty Ltd v Herberton Shire Council[2001] QSC 250Cullinane J
Please Note: A project is currently underway to digitise this judgment to enhance its onscreen presentation. For now, the original version of this judgment may be viewed onscreen and downloaded as a text-analysed and searchable PDF document.
Click here for more information.
Word Highlighter:
Original Version Loading (as on screen PDF)
Preparing document for printing…
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Mazelow Pty Ltd v Herberton Shire Council
Shortened Case Name:
Mazelow Pty Ltd v Herberton Shire Council
MNC:
[2001] QSC 250
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Cullinane J
Date:
31 May 2001
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2001] QSC 250
31 May 2001
Plaintiff applied for discovery of document over which defendant claimed privilege; defendant ordered to disclose document and pay costs of application: Cullinane J
Primary Judgment
[2001] QSC 465
03 Dec 2001
Parties applied for determination of separate question regarding interpretation of construction contract; whether contract excluded right to accept repudiation by notice; separate question answered and defendant ordered to pay plaintiff's costs: Cullinane J
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2002] QCA 119 [2003] 1 Qd R 174
05 Apr 2002
Defendant appealed against [2001] QSC 465; whether primary judge erred in concluding common law rights not excluded; appeal dismissed with costs: McPherson and Williams JJA and Muir J
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Cases Cited
Case Name
Full Citation
Frequency
ACC v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd
(1998) 153 ALR 393
1 citation
Alfred Crompton Amusement Machines Ltd v Customs and Excise Commissioners (No. 2)