Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment
  • Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)

Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd[2013] QSC 228

Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd[2013] QSC 228

CITATION: Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 228
JUDGE(S): Daubney J
DELIVERED ON: 30 August 2013
Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd

  • MNC:

    [2013] QSC 228

  • Court:

    QSC

  • Judge(s):

    Daubney J

  • Date:

    30 Aug 2013

Litigation History

EventCitation or FileDateNotes
Primary Judgment[2013] QSC 22830 Aug 2013Application by the defendant for summary judgment, pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 293, which turned on a discrete question as to whether the plaintiff’s claim was statute barred. Application dismissed: Daubney J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)[2014] QCA 233 [2015] 1 Qd R 47616 Sep 2014Appeal dismissed with costs: Margaret McMurdo P and Ann Lyons J agreeing, Holmes JA dissenting.
Application for Special Leave (HCA)File Number: B42/1421 Oct 2014-
Special Leave Refused (HCA)[2015] HCATrans 8617 Apr 2015The applicant sought special leave to appeal from an interlocutory order refusing summary judgment on the basis that the determination of principle for which the plaintiff contends requires the finding of facts as to the manifestation of damage. For those reasons the application was premature. Special leave refused with costs: Kiefel J and Nettle J.

Appeal Status

Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.