Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd
[2013] QSC 228
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd [2013] QSC 228
JUDGE(S):
Daubney J
DELIVERED ON:
30 August 2013
Close
Editorial Notes
Published Case Name:
Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd
Shortened Case Name:
Springfield Land Development Corporation v Melisavon Pty Ltd
MNC:
[2013] QSC 228
Court:
QSC
Judge(s):
Daubney J
Date:
30 Aug 2013
Litigation History
Event
Citation or File
Date
Notes
Primary Judgment
[2013] QSC 228
30 Aug 2013
Application by the defendant for summary judgment, pursuant to Uniform Civil Procedure Rules r 293, which turned on a discrete question as to whether the plaintiff’s claim was statute barred. Application dismissed: Daubney J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2014] QCA 233 [2015] 1 Qd R 476
16 Sep 2014
Appeal dismissed with costs: Margaret McMurdo P and Ann Lyons J agreeing, Holmes JA dissenting.
Application for Special Leave (HCA)
File Number: B42/14
21 Oct 2014
-
Special Leave Refused (HCA)
[2015] HCATrans 86
17 Apr 2015
The applicant sought special leave to appeal from an interlocutory order refusing summary judgment on the basis that the determination of principle for which the plaintiff contends requires the finding of facts as to the manifestation of damage. For those reasons the application was premature. Special leave refused with costs: Kiefel J and Nettle J.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined - Special Leave Refused (HCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.