R v Coake
[1999] QCA 12
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
- Unreported Judgment
- Appeal Determined (QCA)
- R v Coake[1999] QCA 12
- Add to List
R v Coake[1999] QCA 12
R v Coake[1999] QCA 12
COURT OF APPEAL
de JERSEY CJ
McMURDO P
McPHERSON JA
CA No 403 of 1998
THE QUEEN
v.
PAUL ARTHUR COAKE
BRISBANE
DATE 05/02/99
JUDGMENT
THE PRESIDENT: The applicant pleaded guilty in the District Court at Townsville to one count of dangerous driving with a circumstance of aggravation, namely that he had a blood alcohol content of .201. The maximum penalty for this offence is five years imprisonment. The applicant was sentenced to two years imprisonment suspended after eight months with a two year operational period. He was further disqualified from holding or obtaining a driver's licence for three years.
The offence occurred in this way. Just as he was about to leave for Tasmania by air, the applicant became emotionally distressed when he learned that his ex de facto in Tasmania would not allow him to see their child. He cancelled the trip and then drank to excess, after which he drove his motor cycle at 2.40 p.m. on 27 April 1998.
Not surprisingly, with his blood alcohol, he was noticed by police and a police chase ensued at speeds of up to 120 kilometres per hour in a 60 kilometre per hour area. The applicant almost lost control of his bike at one time and drove through red lights at another. Other vehicles had to take evasive action to avoid a collision. He stopped when he finally lost control of the bike. He was then apprehended by police. Fortunately there was no property or personal damage but this is more through good luck than good management.
The applicant was 33 years old with a good work history. He is now 34 years of age. His criminal history consisted of minor drug offences over 10 years ago. His traffic history included one conviction for driving under the influence of liquor in 1986.
There are serious aspects to this offence. The applicant knowingly created a potentially dangerous situation by driving his motor cycle whilst four times over the legal limit permitted and in those circumstances taking part in a police chase at high speeds in a suburban area in mid to early afternoon.
In my view, a deterrent sentence is necessary in such a case to stress to the community that dangerous driving, particularly in a police chase situation and whilst heavily under the influence of alcohol or drugs, will not be tolerated because of the potential danger created.
The consequences that will follow for those who take part in such conduct will usually include a prison sentence. The learned sentencing Judge was of a similar view. He took notice of the applicant's plea of guilty and the mitigating factors mentioned by defence counsel below and on this appeal.
The sentence of two years imprisonment was within the range. The mitigating factors including the guilty plea were properly reflected in the suspension of that sentence after eight months. I would not interfere with the sentence imposed below.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: I agree.
McPHERSON JA: I agree.
THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The application is refused.