To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Plaintiffs claimed sum owing by first defendant under alleged lease and guaranteed by second and third defendants; whether binding contract existed; judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of $72,605.75: Samios DCJ
QCA Interlocutory Judgment
[2004] QCA 194
12 May 2004
Consent order as per draft: Williams JA, Muir and Mullins JJ
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2004] QCA 256
30 Jul 2004
Defendants appealed against [2004] QDC 45; where lease terminated early; whether guarantees extended to termination payments; appeal allowed and judgment reduced to $33,573.36: McPherson, Williams and Jerrard JJA
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2005] QCA 44
01 Mar 2005
Defendants applied under rr 388 or 667(2) to correct orders made in [2004] QCA 256; where first defendant included in orders but not party to appeal; orders varied by limiting operation to second and third defendants: McPherson, Williams and Jerrard JJA
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.