To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
Please Note: You are about to print a copy of the onscreen
version of
this judgment. For court use, a full PDF copy of the judgment is required or preferred. Please
return to
the case for PDF printing options.
Application by defendant AMP to restrain solicitors and counsel who act for the plaintiff in proceeding SC3544/00 from continuing to do so; same solicitors and counsel act for EPAS as plaintiff in S3544/2000 and for TCSSL as plaintiff in SC3543/2000 (where EPAS is the seventh defendant); unpersuaded that it would be contrary to the due administration of justice and the integrity of the judicial process for the solicitors and counsel to continue to act for EPAS; application dismissed: Wilson J.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QSC 47
06 Mar 2007
Costs of disqualification applications following reasons given in [2007] QSC 38; AMP pay costs on the indemnity basis, as well as the costs thrown away from the adjournment of other applications that were delayed due to the disqualification applications: Wilson J.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QSC 49
07 Mar 2007
Application by AMP for leave to appeal cost orders made in [2007] QSC 49; application for leave dismissed: Wilson J.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QSC 155
01 Jun 2007
Costs judgment following reasons in strike out application judgment [2007] QSC 127; applicant pay AMP's costs on 2 April 2007 and 9 February 2007 applications: Wilson J.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QSC 127
01 Jun 2007
Strike out applications against AMP's defence in both SC3543/00 and SC3544/00 by plaintiff in both proceedings dismissed; ordered that AMP file particulars for losses and gains relied upon: Wilson J.
Primary Judgment
[2007] QSC 162
05 Jul 2007
Application by plaintiff in SC3543/00 and SC3544/00 for summary judgment against certain defendants not active in proceeding; applications adjourned to a date to be fixed: Wilson J.
Appeal Determined (QCA)
[2007] QCA 212
27 Jun 2007
Appeal dismissed with costs; appeal by AMP against decision in SC3544/00 to dismiss application for orders restraining lawyers for EPAS from continuing to act in both trial division proceedings; seeking to utilise inherent jurisdiction of the Supreme Court to control the conduct of its officers; it is ASIC which speaks for EPAS in giving instructions to the company's lawyers for the purpose of proceedings instituted by ASIC: Jerrard and Keane JJA and White J.
Appeal Status
Appeal Determined (QCA)
Please select (using the checkboxes) which search results you would like to add to a list.