White v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2013] QCA 357
To print this judgment please return to the case and click on the PDF icon
next to the
case name. For court use, a full PDF copy is required or preferred.
White v Australian Securities and Investments Commission & Ors
White v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
[2013] QCA 357
QCA
Muir JA, Gotterson JA, Applegarth J
03 Dec 2013
Yes
Event | Citation or File | Date | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Primary Judgment | [2012] QSC 59 | 21 Feb 2012 | Objection by the seventh defendant to the use of an affidavit annexing affidavits from other proceedings overruled: Fryberg J. |
Primary Judgment | [2012] QSC 72 | 16 Mar 2012 | Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed against the first defendant (a company in liquidation) granted: Fryberg J. |
Primary Judgment | [2012] QSC 74 | 28 Mar 2012 | Certain paragraphs of defences struck out and directions made that fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants to comply with UCPR pleading regime: Fryberg J. |
Primary Judgment | [2013] QSC 15 | 29 Jan 2013 | Plaintiff's application for summary judgment against the first defendant refused; fifth defendant's application seeking to restrain plaintiff from obtaining summary judgment against first defendant refused: Fryberg J. |
Primary Judgment | [2013] QSC 280 | 17 Oct 2013 | Declaration that notices to the fourth to eighth defendants given by the plaintiff pursuant to s 79(1) of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act (Cth) are invalid: Douglas J. |
Primary Judgment | [2013] QSC 313 | 11 Nov 2013 | Applications to stay trial until determination of New Zealand prosecutions refused: Fryberg J. |
Primary Judgment | [2013] QSC 355 | 28 Nov 2013 | Direction made that a witness answer a question: Douglas J. |
Primary Judgment | [2014] QSC 72 [2015] 2 Qd R 32 | 22 Apr 2014 | Determination as to the use to which an affidavit may be put without the deponent being cross-examined in relation to it: Douglas J. |
Primary Judgment | [2014] QSC 204 | 07 Aug 2014 | Determination made that witness not permitted to be cross-examined by being shown his answer to a question in an examination of him pursuant to s 597 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) where he had claimed privilege against self-incrimination in that examination: Douglas J. |
Primary Judgment | [2016] QSC 109 | 23 May 2016 | Primary judgment: defendants' found to have contravened ss 601FC and 601FD of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): Douglas J. |
Primary Judgment | [2017] QSC 96 | 26 May 2017 | Declaratory relief ordered; fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants ordered to pay pecuniary penalties and compensation; fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants disqualified from managing any corporation; costs orders made against fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants: Douglas J. |
Notice of Appeal Filed | File Number: Appeals 6281/17; 6289/17; 6306/17; 6319/17; 6320/17 | 23 Jun 2017 | Appeals from [2016] QSC 109 and [2017] QSC 96. |
Appeal Determined (QCA) | [2012] QCA 301 [2013] 2 Qd R 401 | 02 Nov 2012 | Appeal from [2012] QSC 74 allowed; each of the fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth defendants to be partly excused from compliance with the UCPR pleading regime: Holmes and White JJA and McMurdo J. |
Appeal Determined (QCA) | [2013] QCA 88 | 19 Apr 2013 | Application by Australian Securities and Investments Commission to vary costs order in [2012] QCA 301 refused: Holmes and White JJA and McMurdo J. |
Appeal Determined (QCA) | [2013] QCA 357 | 03 Dec 2013 | Appeal from [2013] QSC 313 (refusal of application to stay proceedings) dismissed: Muir and Gotterson JJA and Applegarth J. |
Appeal Determined (QCA) | [2018] QCA 352 | 18 Dec 2018 | Appeals from [2016] QSC 109 and [2017] QSC 96. All appeals (and cross-appeals by ASIC) dismissed save for Appeal 6320/17 whereby appealed allowed in part with respect to the conclusion that Mr King was an officer and therefore Mr King's appeal allowed to the extent that he contravened the duties prescribed by s 601FD of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth): Morrison and McMurdo JJA and Applegarth J. |
Appeal Determined (QCA) | [2019] QCA 121 | 18 Jun 2019 | Form of order and costs of [2018] QCA 352: Morrison and McMurdo JJA and Applegarth J. |
Special Leave Granted (HCA) | [2019] HCATrans 104 | 17 May 2019 | Special leave application instituted by Australian Securities and Investments Commission against Mr King (Appeal 6320/17) granted: Bell and Keane JJ |
Special Leave Refused (HCA) | [2020] HCASL 117 | 24 Apr 2020 | Special leave refused from [2019] QCA 121 (orders varying pecuniary penalty and costs orders but refusing to vary a disqualification order) - those orders were set aside in [2020] HCA 4 and further the grounds sought to be agitated were entirely unpersuasive: Bell and Nettle JJ. |
HCA Transcript | [2019] HCATrans 195 | 09 Oct 2019 | Transcript of hearing before High Court of Australia; Australian Securities and Investments Commission's application to add a further ground to the application for special leave: special leave granted; Mr King's application for special leave to cross-appeal refused: Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ. |
HCA Judgment | [2020] HCA 4 | 11 Mar 2020 | Appeal allowed; paragraphs 1, 2 and 7 of the order of the Court of appeal set aside and in lieu order that the appeal be dismissed: Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Keane, Nettle and Gordon JJ. |