Queensland Judgments
Authorised Reports & Unreported Judgments
Exit Distraction Free Reading Mode
  • Unreported Judgment

Bradley v The Crown[2020] QCA 252

[2020] QCA 252

COURT OF APPEAL

SOFRONOFF P

MULLINS JA

BODDICE J

CA No 78 of 2020

DC No 3771 of 2019

BRADLEY, Ross James Applicant

v

THE CROWN

BRISBANE

FRIDAY, 13 NOVEMBER 2020

JUDGMENT

SOFRONOFF P:  The applicant was charged with one count of unlicensed driving.  He was convicted and fined $150 with no conviction recorded.  He applied to the magistrate to dismiss the charge on the ground that for reasons that are not clear a police officer had no power to charge him or to commence the proceedings in question.  The argument was obvious nonsense and the magistrate rightly rejected it.  After hearing the evidence led by the prosecution, the magistrate found the applicant guilty as charged.

Not satisfied with this outcome, the applicant appealed to the District Court and argued that he was something which he called a citizen sovereign and that the laws of Queensland did not apply to him.  If that was true, then it would be hard to understand why the applicant was agitating his complaints before this court, which is one that has been established under the laws that he says do not apply to him.  This paradox did not trouble the applicant and he has now applied for leave to appeal against Judge Moynihan QC’s order dismissing his appeal.  That the applicant is merely persisting in putting forward a jumble of gobbledygook to support his application in this court can be seen at once if one reads only the two opening sentences of his purported outline of argument:

“My BRADLEY person (conjoined with the BRADLEY ‘spiritual’ family body-politic) is my own “body politic” by succession, at Law.  It is my natural body incorporated at the supreme Christian Law and is my own jurisdiction.”

This application is an abuse of the court’s process and should be dismissed.

MULLINS JA:  I agree.

BODDICE J:  I agree.

Close

Editorial Notes

  • Published Case Name:

    Bradley v The Crown

  • Shortened Case Name:

    Bradley v The Crown

  • MNC:

    [2020] QCA 252

  • Court:

    QCA

  • Judge(s):

    Sofronoff P, Mullins JA, Boddice J

  • Date:

    13 Nov 2020

Appeal Status

Please note, appeal data is presently unavailable for this judgment. This judgment may have been the subject of an appeal.

Cases Cited

No judgments cited by this judgment.

Cases Citing

Case NameFull CitationFrequency
Dent v Commissioner of Police [2022] QDC 2351 citation
Handley v Commissioner of Police [2024] QDC 1161 citation
Hobson v Grant [2025] QCATA 632 citations
Murray v Pinder [2020] QSC 3852 citations
R v Sweet [2021] QDC 2162 citations
Reiman v Commissioner of Police [2021] QDC 2422 citations
Sorensen v Queensland Police Service [2022] QDC 1211 citation
1

Require Technical Assistance?

Message sent!

Thanks for reaching out! Someone from our team will get back to you soon.

Message not sent!

Something went wrong. Please try again.